Brazilian Journal of Microbiology Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
Braz J Microbiol 2018;49:279-84 - Vol. 49 Num.2 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.006
Environmental Microbiology
Molecular screening of blue mussels indicated high mid-summer prevalence of human genogroup II Noroviruses, including the pandemic “GII.4 2012” variants in UK coastal waters during 2013
Subhajit Biswas1,, , Philippa Jackson, Rebecca Shannon, Katherine Dulwich, Soumi Sukla1, Ronald A. Dixon
University of Lincoln, School of Life Sciences, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Received 05 April 2017, Accepted 22 June 2017
Abstract

This molecular study is the first report, to the best of our knowledge, on identification of norovirus, NoV GII.4 Sydney 2012 variants, from blue mussels collected from UK coastal waters. Blue mussels (three pooled samples from twelve mussels) collected during the 2013 summer months from UK coastal sites were screened by RT-PCR assays. PCR products of RdRP gene for noroviruses were purified, sequenced and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. All the samples tested positive for NoVs. Sequencing revealed that the NoV partial RdRP gene sequences from two pooled samples clustered with the pandemic “GII.4 Sydney variants” whilst the other pooled sample clustered with the NoV GII.2 variants. This molecular study indicated mussel contamination with pathogenic NoVs even during mid-summer in UK coastal waters which posed potential risk of NoV outbreaks irrespective of season. As the detection of Sydney 2012 NoV from our preliminary study of natural coastal mussels interestingly corroborated with NoV outbreaks in nearby areas during the same period, it emphasizes the importance of environmental surveillance work for forecast of high risk zones of NoV outbreaks.

Keywords
Blue mussels, Norovirus, GII.4 Sydney variant, Coastal water
Introduction

Blue mussels (Mytilus spp) are filter-feeders and are widespread in European coastal waters, which are often in close proximity to urban sewage treatment units.1,2 Filter-feeders may retain particles at 4μm with 100% efficiency.3 Faecal contamination of water (via sewage discharge) poses a serious threat to human health as bivalves (mussels and oysters) which filter large volumes of water through their gills as part of their feeding activities, bio-accumulate pathogenic microbes, including enteric bacteria and viruses. In situ studies with bio-accumulation of a virus indicator in oysters have shown that they can effectively concentrate viruses (up to 99-fold) compared to the surrounding water.4 An adult blue mussel may filter ∼72L of water on an average per day5 and have been proposed as bio-samplers for assessment of faecal contamination in recreational waters.6 Consumption of bivalves as food is often reported to be the cause of disease outbreaks by enteric viruses. Though primary infection results from ingestion of faecal contaminated food or water, unintentional ingestion of contaminated recreational waters can also lead to gastrointestinal illness.7 Norovirus outbreaks have a distinct seasonality linked to winter months.8,9 NoV infections are called “gastric flu” for its similar seasonality & lack of effective therapeutics like influenza viruses, and also for its high infectivity and rapid evolution.10,11

Noroviruses (NoVs) are a non-enveloped positive sense single-stranded RNA virus of the Caliciviridae family. NoVs have a significant impact on human health as they are highly infectious and cause acute gastroenteritis in all age groups accounting for >200,000 deaths worldwide each year, especially in children.12 The organism is highly contagious and problematic as a hospital-acquired infection. According to WHO, <10 virions are sufficient to cause infection in adults and NoV outbreaks often lead to closure of entire hospital wards every year affecting both patients and staff. Despite attempts to control via ‘deep cleaning’ and implementing hygiene measures outbreaks can cause considerable inconvenience and economic losses.13–15 NoVs cannot be cultured on cells and detection and diagnosis increasingly relies solely on molecular methods such as reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR).16 Diversity of NoVs both genetically and antigenically were demonstrated through RT-PCR and genomic sequencing.17 NoVs are divided into six genogroups (GI-GVI) and genogroups are further subdivided into around forty genetic clusters or genotypes.18 NoV genogroups which infect humans are I (NoV GI), II (NoV GII) and rarely IV (NoV GIV). NoV GII.4 is responsible for 80% of the disease outbreaks19 and is currently the most virulent strain circulating in the UK.20 Since it has a faster mutation rate than other NoVs21 new variants emerge every 2–3 years and is also responsible for 60–80% of outbreaks worldwide.22 The GII.4 variant named Sydney 2012 has progressively replaced the predecessor GII.4 New Orleans 2009 variant globally.23,24

GII.4 outbreaks occurred preferentially during winter months25 and most works have been conducted with samples collected during winter months.26 Thus the aim of the present study was to screen for NoV contamination/retention in bivalves during the summer months in the UK coastal seawaters. This work contributes to the development of a working methodology for the routine surveillance of mussels round the year for identification and genetic characterization of enteric pathogenic viruses accumulated within them.

Materials and methodsCollection and processing of samples

Eight wild blue mussels (numbered 1–8) were collected in April 2013; they were attached to a nylon rope fragment on the metal supporting girders under Mumbles Pier at The Mumbles, Swansea, UK. Another four mussels (numbered 9–12) were obtained in June 2013 from the Royal Dock at Grimsby, UK. Hepatopancreas, gills and gastrointestinal tissues were dissected out from these mussels. Tissues (∼3.0g) from mussels 1–4, 5–8 and 9–12 constituted the three pooled samples 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Mussel tissues were triturated; digested with proteinase K and centrifuged at 3000×g to collect ∼5mL supernatant.27 The supernatant was filtered to remove tissue and other debris including unwanted microbes (like bacteria and fungi) using 0.45μM filter (Anachem-Supatop, UK) for further downstream applications.

Viral RNA extraction, reverse transcription and nested PCR

Following processing of the samples, viral RNA was extracted using QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Extracted RNA (in 60μL water) was used for reverse transcription to cDNA using BioScript RT-PCR Kit (Bioline, UK) and NoV-specific reverse primer, 1422.28

The cDNA was amplified using NoV GI-specific (PCR Nos. 443, 446) and GII-specific (PCR Nos. 443, 444) semi-nested PCRs (Expand High Fidelity PCR kit, Roche, Germany) according to previously published protocols.29 These PCRs target part of the NoV RNA polymerase, RdRP gene. The PCR numbering has been adopted from the numbering of the PCR protocols as previously published.28

The target amplicon sizes were 327bp for the first round PCR (No. 443) for both NoV GI and GII; 188bp for the second round PCR in case of NoV GI and 237bp for NoVGII. Positive PCR-amplified products (electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel) were purified and custom-sequenced for both strands.

The sequencing primers were the same forward and reverse primers of the respective PCRs that resulted in visible bands on the gel (e.g. primers for PCR No. 446 for GI NoV or 444 for GII NoV).

Armoured RNA (Cells-to-cDNA™ II Kit, Ambion, UK) was used as positive control by spiking extracted RNA from mussels with the armoured RNA to test for RT and PCR inhibitors in the mussel RNA concentrate.

Samples 1–3 were further screened for NoV GI and NoV GII capsid genes using nested PCRs (PCR Nos. 475, 476) and (PCR Nos. 437, 438) respectively and also for HAV (PCR Nos. 675, 676) following previously published protocols.28

All three samples were also screened for NoV GIV (PCR Nos. 603, 612; 546, 542) and COG4F, G4SKR and G4SKF.28,30 For NoV GIV detection by PCR nos. 603 and 612, the reverse primer 1565 used for cDNA synthesis had the sequence as described earlier31 and not as described in La Rosa et al.28 The latter sequence appears to be incorrect. Samples 2 and 3 were further tested for HEV (PCR Nos. 711, 712) and astrovirus (PCR Nos. 696, 697).

Sequencing

Nucleotide (nt) sequences, confirmed by bi-directional sequencing of the PCR products (PCRs 446, 444) were subject to NCBI BLAST for determining genetic matches with sequences available in the database. They were then aligned using Clustal W with other closely related NoV sequences identified from the BLAST search. A phylogenetic tree was generated by the neighbour-joining method using MEGA 632 on 169 nt of RdRP gene (pertaining to nt positions 4326–4494 as in JX459908 NoV GII.4 Sydney variant) to characterize the NoV strains and study their genetic distances with other closely related NoV strains.

ResultsSequencing of NoVs

All three samples were positive for NoV GII-specific PCR (No. 444) (Fig. 1A and B). Samples 2 and 3 were also positive for NoV GI-specific PCR (No. 446) (Fig. 1B, sample 2 is shown) and produced PCR products of expected band length (188bp). All samples were negative for GIV NoV. Samples screened for other enteric viruses were also negative (within the limits of detection of the PCRs performed) except a PCR product of expected size (PCR No. 712; 457bp) observed for HEV in case of sample 3. However, sequencing pooled product from three such bands resulted in non-HEV sequences as also in case of non-NoV sequences observed for the 188bp band from the NoV GI-specific PCR (data not shown). GI & GII NoV PCRs targeting NoV capsid genes (PCR Nos. 476, 438) were negative.

Fig. 1.
(0.2MB).

Representative gel electrophoresis of second round PCR products on 1.5% agarose gels, for NoV GI (PCR 446) and NoV GII (PCR444) from mussel samples 1 and 2. (A) Mussel sample 1 PCR. Lane 1: Hyperladder IV (Bioline, UK); Lane 3: Negative control for NoV GII-specific PCR (PCR Nos. 443, 444; nuclease-free water as template for both PCRs); Product for PCR no. 444 was run on gel, Lane 5: NoV GII PCR product (237bp); Lane 7: Positive control for PCR inhibitors in mussels (147bp). (B) Mussel sample 2 PCR. Lane 1: Hyperladder IV; Lane 2: NoV GI PCR product (188bp); Lane 3: NoV GII PCR product (237bp).

Relationships with other NoVs

Phylogenetic analysis of aligned sequences revealed that samples 1 and 2 from Swansea clustered closely with several pandemic NoV GII.4 2012 variants. Both samples, however, had differences at nucleotide (nt) sequence levels. NoV from sample 1 was named GII. 4 UK 2013a and that from sample 2 was named GII.4 UK 2013b. The GII.4 Sydney variants of NoVs from mussels in the present study clustered with NoVs of Chinese and Taiwanese origin (Fig. 1).

The sample 3 from Grimsby clustered closely with other NoV GII.2 strains and this NoV was named GII.2 UK 2013 (Fig. 2). NoV GI-specific PCR products from samples 2 and 3 produced non-NoV sequences which could not be matched with any known sequence using BLAST.

Fig. 2.
(0.19MB).

Phylogenetic analysis of the norovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (partial) of several NoV genogroups and genotypes. NoV sequences, retrieved from GenBank for comparing with our NoV strains in the mussels are identified by their GenBank accession numbers on the figure. The scale bar indicates genetic distance in terms of nucleotide substitution/site/year.

Though both samples contained NoV GII.4, the predominant strains as preferentially amplified by PCRs were different as evident from nucleotide differences in their RdRP gene sequences and reflected in phylogenetic clustering (Fig. 2). In the tree, prototype sequence from a NoV GII obtained from GenBank (accession number X86557) and an outgroup sequence from a NoV GI (AF093797) were included. Prototype for NoV GII.4 included in the tree was the Sydney 2012 variant (accession number JX459907) which interestingly caused high incidence of NoV outbreaks in the UK during 2012. Both the NoV GII.4 variants from Swansea grouped closely with the 2012 NoV GII.4 human strains, including the “Sydney 2012” variants as detected earlier.24 The most interesting finding of this study is the fact that NovGII.4 Sydney variants were found even in a pilot scale of samples which advocates for the high prevalence of these pathogenic genotypes in the mussels of UK coastal waters.

Discussion

NoVs are most common cause of outbreaks of food-borne illnesses and pose serious health risks to humans. In the present small-scale study, mussel samples obtained from seawater near Swansea were found to contain two GII.4 variants. In February 2012, four wards were closed in a nearby public hospital due to NoV outbreak (http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-17110220 accessed on 14.10.2015). However, if the GII.4 virus strains identified in the mussels were genetically identical to the NoV strains responsible for the Swansea outbreaks, it would demonstrate that these viruses probably survive the sewage treatment process and concentrate in mussels. This could not be analyzed in the present study as no sequence data on the outbreak of NoV strains from Swansea in 2012 were available in the public domain. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the most commonly detected GII.4 strain in the healthcare settings in UK in the season (2013–2015) was Sydney 2012 (PHE Monthly National Norovirus and Rotavirus Report, 14 April, 2016).33 NoV capsid PCRs were negative which could have resulted from primer mismatch as capsid proteins are exposed to higher level of immune pressure and therefore, immune selection compared to more conserved non-structural proteins like virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Consequently, the capsid genes are more prone to higher rates of mutation. As humans are mostly infected by the GII strains, the present work indicates the need for a larger study of surveillance of enteric viruses (e.g. NoV, HAV virus and HEV, rotaviruses and others) that contaminate coastal waters of the UK and become bio-accumulated in mussels, clams and oysters34 confirming their role as a food chain source of infection.

NoV GI and GII have been detected in oyster samples harvested from bays and estuaries worldwide35,36 and also from human samples.25 However, this is the first report, to the best of our knowledge, on NoV GII.4 Sydney 2012 variant detected in blue mussels collected from UK coastal waters. It suggests that choosing noroviruses as a parameter would be worthy enough if viral testing of mussels is introduced on a routine basis. It was also interesting to note that norovirus is highly detectable even in a small scale sampling of mussels during summer months, suggesting the possible prevalence of pathogenic NoV strains contaminating UK coastal waters throughout the year.

It had been reported earlier that NoV outbreaks are more likely to occur during winter4 as cold water temperatures and reduced ultraviolet light increase their survival.37 The present work detected NoVs to a great extent even in summer months, so it may be proposed that mussels act as reservoirs to retain and shelter the viruses round the year so that they can contribute to the flux of viable NoVs contamination of sea waters during winter and potentiate greater spread to cause severe outbreaks of NoV infections during the winter months.

One limitation of the present work was that the sample size was not large but still comparable to that reported earlier.28 Despite pilot level sample size, the interesting and important observation was that different pathogenic NOV GII, including GII.4 Sydney variants (as evident from sequence variations in the RdRp gene) could be detected from potentially all the blue mussels collected. This suggests substantial environmental contamination which perhaps explains why Sydney 2012 variant was isolated from most UK outbreaks during 2013–15. One possible explanation for the clustering of the GII.4 Sydney variants of NoVs from mussels with NoVs of Chinese and Taiwanese origin could be that the mussel collection sites in the present study were places where year-round maritime activities take place and coastal water contamination from ships and vessels from faraway places could not be ruled out. Surveillance and control of NoV outbreaks related to mussel and other shellfish consumption is therefore crucial to prevent spread of infection in the population. We believe that this work will be an important addendum to the ongoing research in NoV epidemiology in the UK.38–40

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors have agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The funding for this study was from the School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln and Students into Work Grant (awarded to RD for RS), Society for Applied Microbiology, UK. We thank Angela Murtagh and Dr Ross Williams, School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln for collecting the mussel samples.

References
1
G.N. Goblick,J.M. Anbarchian,J. Woods,W. Burkhardt,K. Calci
Evaluating the dilution of wastewater treatment plant effluent and viral impacts on shellfish growing areas in Mobile Bay, Alabama
J Shellfish Res, 30 (2011), pp. 979-987
2
J.C. Futch,D.W. Griffin,K. Banks,E.K. Lipp
Evaluation of sewage source and fate on southeast Florida coastal reefs
Mar Pollut Bull, 62 (2011), pp. 2308-2316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.046
3
F. Møhlenberg,H.U. Riisgård
Efficiency of particle retention in 13 species of suspension feeding bivalves
Ophelia, 17 (1978), pp. 239-246
4
J. Wang,Z. Deng
Detection and forecasting of oyster norovirus outbreaks: recent advances and future perspectives
Mar Environ Res, 80 (2012), pp. 62-69 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.06.011
5
P.J. Cranford,J.E. Ward,S.E. Shumway
Bivalve filter feeding: variability and limits of the aquaculture biofilter
Shellfish Aquaculture and the Environment,
6
P. Roslev,A. Bukh,L. Iversen,H. Sonderbo,N. Iversen
Application of mussels as biosamplers for characterization of faecal pollution in coastal recreational waters
Water Sci Technol, 62 (2010), pp. 586-593 http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.910
7
N.P. Nenonen,C. Hannoun,P. Horal,B. Hernroth,T. Bergstrom
Tracing of norovirus outbreak strains in mussels collected near sewage effluents
Appl Environ Microbiol, 74 (2008), pp. 2544-2549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02477-07
8
K. Bok,K.Y. Green
Norovirus gastroenteritis in immunocompromised patients
N Engl J Med, 367 (2012), pp. 2126-2132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1207742
9
Y. Gao,M. Jin,X. Cong
Clinical and molecular epidemiologic analyses of norovirus-associated sporadic gastroenteritis in adults from Beijing, China
J Med Virol, 83 (2011), pp. 1078-1085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.22077
10
B. Lopman,M. Zambon,D.W. Brown
The evolution of norovirus, the “gastric flu”
11
R.A. Bull,P.A. White
Mechanisms of GII.4 norovirus evolution
Trends Microbiol, 19 (2011), pp. 233-240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.01.002
12
M.M. Patel,M.A. Widdowson,R.I. Glass,K. Akazawa,J. Vinjé,U.D. Parashar
Systematic literature review of role of noroviruses in sporadic gastroenteritis
Emerg Infect Dis, 14 (2008), pp. 1224-1231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1408.071114
13
S. Bartsch,B. Lopman,A. Hall,U.D. Parashar,B.Y. Lee
The potential economic value of a human norovirus vaccine for the United States
14
B. Lopman,G. Adak,M. Reacher
Two epidemiologic patterns of norovirus outbreaks: surveillance in England and Wales, 1992–2000
Emerg Infect Dis, 9 (2003), pp. 71-77 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0901.020175
15
B. Lopman,M. Reacher,I.B. Vipond
Epidemiology and cost of nosocomial gastroenteritis, Avon, England, 2002–2003
Emerg Infect Dis, 10 (2004), pp. 1827-1834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1010.030941
16
S. Butot,F.S. Le Guyader,J. Krol,T. Putallaz,R. Amoroso,G. Sánchez
Evaluation of various real-time RT-PCR assays for the detection and quantitation of human norovirus
J Virol Methods, 167 (2010), pp. 90-94 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.03.018
17
M.M. Patel,A.J. Hall,J. Vinje,U.D. Parashar
Noroviruses: a comprehensive review
18
K.Y. Green
Caliciviridae: the noroviruses
Fields Virology, pp. 582-608
19
R.L. Fankhauser,S.S. Monroe,J.S. Noel
Epidemiologic and molecular trends of “Norwalk-like viruses” associated with outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the United States
J Infect Dis, 186 (2002), pp. 1-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/341085
20
B. Lopman,B. Armstrong,C. Atchison,J.J. Gray
Host, weather and virological factors drive norovirus epidemiology: time-series analysis of laboratory surveillance data in England and Wales
21
R.A. Bull,J.S. Eden,W.D. Rawlinson,P.A. White
Rapid evolution of pandemic noroviruses of the GII.4 lineage
PLoS Pathog, 6 (2010), pp. e1000831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000831
22
Y. Yang,M. Xia,M. Tan
Genetic and phenotypic characterization of GII-4 noroviruses that circulated during 1987 to 2008
J Virol, 84 (2010), pp. 9595-9607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02614-09
23
S. Bennett,A. MacLean,R.S. Miller,C. Aitken,R.N. Gunson
Increased norovirus activity in Scotland in 2012 is associated with the emergence of a new norovirus GII.4 variant
24
J. van Beek,K. Ambert-Balay,N. Botteldoorn
Indications for worldwide increased norovirus activity associated with emergence of a new variant of genotype II.4, late 2012
25
A. Sabria,R.M. Pintó,A. Boscha
Molecular and clinical epidemiology of norovirus outbreaks in Spain during the emergence of GII.4 2012 variant
J Clin Virol, 60 (2014), pp. 96-104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2014.03.013
26
S. Skraber,J. Langlet,J.R. Kremer
Concentration and diversity of Noroviruses detected in Luxembourg wastewaters in 2008–2009
Appl Environ Microbiol, 77 (2011), pp. 5566-5568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00632-11
27
N. Jothikumar,J. Lowther,K. Henshilwood,D.N. Lees,V.R. Hill,J. Vinjé
Rapid and sensitive detection of noroviruses by using TaqMan-based one-step reverse transcription-PCR assays and application to naturally contaminated shellfish samples
Appl Environ Microbiol, 71 (2005), pp. 1870-1875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.4.1870-1875.2005
28
G. La Rosa,M. Fratini,S.V. Vennarucci,A. Guercio,G. Purpari,M. Muscillo
GIV noroviruses and other enteric viruses in bivalves: a preliminary study
New Microbiol, 35 (2012), pp. 27-34
29
G. La Rosa,S. Fontana,A. DiGrazia,M. Iaconelli,M. Pourshaban,M. Muscillo
Molecular identification and genetic analysis of norovirus genogroups I and II in water environments: comparative analysis of different reverse transcription-PCR assays
Appl Environ Microbiol, 73 (2007), pp. 4152-4161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00222-07
30
M. Kitajima,T. Oka,E. Haramoto,N. Takeda,K. Katayama,H. Katayama
Seasonal distribution and genetic diversity in genogroups I, II and IV noroviruses in the Tamagawa River, Japan
Environ Sci Technol, 44 (2010), pp. 7116-7122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es100346a
31
G. La Rosa,M. Iaconelli,M. Pourshaban,M. Fratini,M. Muscillo
Molecular detection and genetic diversity of norovirus genogroup IV: a year-long monitoring of sewage throughout Italy
Arch Virol, 155 (2010), pp. 589-593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0619-y
32
K. Tamura,G. Stecher,D. Peterson,A. Filipski,S. Kumar
MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0
Mol Biol Evol, 30 (2013), pp. 2725-2729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
34
J.A. Lowther,N.E. Gustar,A.L. Powell,R.E. Hartnell,D.N. Lees
Two-year systematic study to assess norovirus contamination in oysters from commercial harvesting areas in the UK
Appl Environ Microbiol, 78 (2012), pp. 5812-5817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01046-12
35
P.K. Cheng,D.K. Wong,T.W. Chung,W.W. Lim
Norovirus contamination found in oysters worldwide
J Med Virol, 76 (2005), pp. 593-597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20402
36
C.I. Gallimore,J.S. Cheesbrough,K. Lamden,C. Bingham,J.J. Gray
Multiple norovirus genotypes characterised from an oyster-associated outbreak of gastroenteritis
Int J Food Microbiol, 103 (2005), pp. 323-330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.02.003
37
T. Westrell,V. Dusch,S. Ethelberg
Norovirus outbreaks linked to oyster consumption in the United Kingdom, Norway, France, Sweden and Denmark
38
J.P. Harris,G.K. Adak,S.J. O’Brien
To close or not to close? Analysis of 4 year's data from national surveillance of norovirus outbreaks in hospitals in England
39
J.R. Brown,D. Shah,J. Breuer
Viral gastrointestinal infections and norovirus genotypes in a paediatric UK hospital, 2014–2015
40
S.J. O’Brien,A.L. Donaldson,M. Iturriza-Gomara,C.C. Tam
Age-specific incidence rates for Norovirus in the community and presenting to primary healthcare facilities in the United Kingdom
J Infect Dis, 213 (2016), pp. S15-S18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv411

Current address: CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700032, India.

Corresponding author. (Subhajit Biswas subhajit.biswas@iicb.res.in)
Copyright © 2017. Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia
Braz J Microbiol 2018;49:279-84 - Vol. 49 Num.2 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.006
Cookies Policy
x
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.